Art walks in latent spaces
At the Los Angeles-based Refik Anadol Studio, artists, architects and data scientists collaborate with machine intelligence to rethink the layered meanings of consciousness and space. Pelin Kivrak, the concept developer at RAS, gives an insight into the Studio’s recent work.

RAS operates in a distinct area of visual experience that builds upon machine learning and synesthesia in art. The Studio’s works utilize various computational design methods, such as architectural projection mapping, custom algorithms and generative adversarial networks (GANs) that train machine intelligence with the purpose of processing vast datasets of visual and textual knowledge. Since its inception in 2014, RAS has been seeking to uncover new dialogic relationships between imagination and physicality, self and environment, technology and history by drawing attention to the growing virtual archives of individual, collective, institutional or artificial memories.
Sense of a space
Most of the Studio’s experiments with memory occur on a material level, either in the form of revealing interconnections between archival materials or looking inside the human brain. In 2017, for instance, RAS created a unique installation in Istanbul called Archive Dreaming, in collaboration with Google’s Artists and Machine Intelligence program. The Studio used machine learning algorithms to transform more than 1.5 million documents from Istanbul’s SALT Research Center’s archives of urban life and art history in Turkey into an interactive multimedia installation.

On a more conceptual level, Anadol claims that RAS speculates a sense of latent space akin to the processes of dreaming and hallucinating that happens after memories become condensed and categorized. Latent space in machine learning is where unobservable connections between data points become closer when compressed. In other words, the works of RAS do not merely allude to dreams by putting forward a series of hypnotic and abstract visual metaphors that are open to interpretation; they indeed show us what would happen if a machine becomes able to emulate the human mind’s subconscious processes. For example, in the Archive Dreaming project, the installation entices the audience into novel modes of sensory experience by looking at images hallucinated by the machine based on the real, material archives that it has previously “seen.” What the audience’s agency brings to this latent space is imbued with another set of – more subjective – codes: narrative, mythical, linguistic, historical, and cultural interpretive tools to encode the accidental yet provocative imagery that an artificial mind presents to them.

Latency as an aesthetic category
The question of what a given space can allow us to reconstruct is more interesting than simply re-constructing a space, physically or metaphorically. Whether in archives of memory, image, text, or unclassified virtual knowledge, the possibility of coincidental interconnections point to a hidden space that is not always accessible through the existing structures and the cognitive functions of the human mind or the AI alone. In many interviews and lectures, and the TED Talk that he gave earlier this year, Anadol dwells on the idea of visualizing the essentially hidden latent space of the human mind by simulating it in “the mind of a machine.”
In celebration of the Los Angeles Philharmonic’s centennial season recently, RAS developed a unique machine intelligence approach to the orchestra’s digital archives to transform the building’s memories into a public art installation, projected onto the exterior of Frank Gehry’s Walt Disney Concert Hall. The dynamic public art piece, WDCH Dreams, displayed data-driven, non-linear patterns based on a data universe created by the LA Phil’s 100-year history and thus gave a metaphoric consciousness to the overlapping spaces of imagination that the iconic building held together. Like Archive Dreams, this project was an important milestone in the Studio’s still ongoing investigations into the elusive process of memory retrieval by rescaling the scope of the inquiry from the individual to the institutional and mapping the results, literally, on the façade of the institution’s building. In addition to immersing the audience in a mesmerizing light spectacle employing 42 large-scale projectors, WDCH Dreams launched an advanced speculative space for the aesthetic potentials of such representations of latency.
In her introduction to Casey Reas’ book Making Pictures with Generative Adversarial Networks, Nora N. Khan writes that artistic experiments with code create a “subjective, interpretive space” for the viewer where the method and the system are less important than the possibilities of this critical space. The artist/architect of this unique practice, according to Khan, makes “space” for a set of potential aesthetic choices. At RAS, these choices end up producing AI-driven “latent cinema” experiences – a term coined by Anadol – in which the buildings, sculptures, images of nature or even musical notes recreate themselves in unpredictable ways, as if yearning for a non-algorithmic autonomy. Just like “the future of AI needs human intelligence” – a quote from Thomas Ramge – contemporary artists like Refik Anadol need AI to find themselves in a latent space of countless choices to simultaneously generate and fulfill new expectations from media arts.
Learn more about Pelin Kivrak's views on the future of creative AI here.